Insubordinate responses to unethical supervisory treatment
Research that examines unethical interpersonal treatment has received a great deal of attention from scholars and practitioners in recent years due to the remarkable impact of mistreatment in the workplace. However, the literature is incomplete because we have an inadequate understanding of insubordination, which the authors define as “subordinates’ disobedient behaviours that intentionally exhibit a defiant refusal of their supervisors’ authority.”
In this study, the authors integrate social exchange theory and the advantageous comparison component of moral disengagement within the integrative model of experiencing and responding to mistreatment at work. Then, the authors explain why subordinates disengage from moral control as they balance experiencing abusive supervision with perpetrating insubordination within negative supervisor–subordinate social exchange relationships.
In Studies 1–4, the authors validate a five-item measure of insubordination and demonstrate its content, convergent, discriminant, criterion-related, and predictive validity. In Study 5 (n = 287), the authors demonstrate that there is a positive indirect effect of abusive supervision on insubordination through negative social exchange relationship quality that strengthens for subordinates who perceive higher levels of supervisors’ task performance than others.
Overall, this study advances the conversation in the business ethics literature by creating a solid conceptual, empirical, and theoretical foundation for a cohesive program of insubordination research that meaningfully builds on prior findings in unethical interpersonal treatment research.
Jeremy D. Mackey, Charn P. McAllister & Katherine C. Alexander. 2021. Insubordination: Validation of a Measure and an Examination of Insubordinate Responses to Unethical Supervisory Treatment.