<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Research Tidbits | Institute for Sustainable Leadership</title>
	<atom:link href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/category/research-tidbits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com</link>
	<description>driving high performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:22:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Research tidbits: Impact of leadership on ethics</title>
		<link>https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-impact-of-leadership-on-ethics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doryanthus293]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 20:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Tidbits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/?p=6418</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do all ethical behaviours come from within, or is it a case of creating a conducive work environment?]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-1 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-0 fusion_builder_column_1_4 1_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:25%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:7.68%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:7.68%;--awb-width-medium:25%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:7.68%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:7.68%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-image-element " style="text-align:left;--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h2_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h2_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h2_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h2_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h2_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h2_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h2_typography-letter-spacing);"><span class=" fusion-imageframe imageframe-dropshadow imageframe-1 hover-type-none" style="-webkit-box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><img decoding="async" width="200" height="132" src="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/entrepreneur-593358_200.jpg" alt class="img-responsive wp-image-5860"/></span></div></div></div><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-1 fusion_builder_column_3_4 3_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:75%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:2.56%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:2.56%;--awb-width-medium:75%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:2.56%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:2.56%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-title title fusion-title-1 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-one"><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-left fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div><span class="awb-title-spacer fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"></span><h1 class="fusion-title-heading title-heading-left fusion-responsive-typography-calculated" style="margin:0;--fontSize:28;line-height:1.5;"><h3>Our research tidbits this week provides interesting examples when considering what it takes to become a good leader. Do all ethical behaviours come from within, or is it more a case of creating a conducive work environment?</h3></h1><span class="awb-title-spacer"></span><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-right"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-2 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-2 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-1"><p><span class="tidbithdr">The impact of authoritarian leadership on ethical voice in police</span><br />
In a sample of 522 police officers and staff in an English police force, the authors investigated the role of authoritarian leadership in reducing the levels of employee ethical voice (i.e., employees discussing and speaking out opinions against unethical issues in the workplace).</p>
<p>Drawing upon uncertainty management theory, the authors found that authoritarian leadership was negatively related to employee ethical voice through increased levels of felt uncertainty, when the effects of a motivational-based mechanism suggested by previous studies were controlled. In addition, the authors found that the negative relationship between authoritarian leadership and employee ethical voice via felt uncertainty is mitigated by higher levels of benevolent leadership. That is, when authoritarian leaders simultaneously exhibit benevolence, they are less likely to cause feelings of uncertainty in their followers who are then more likely to speak up about unethical issues.</p>
<p>The authors discuss theoretical and practical implications of the findings.</p>
<p>Yuyan Zheng, Les Graham, Jiing-Lih Farh &amp; Xu Huang. 2021. <strong><em>The Impact of Authoritarian Leadership on Ethical Voice: A Moderated Mediation Model of Felt Uncertainty and Leader Benevolence</em>.</strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-1 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04261-1"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 170(1), 133–146. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-3 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-3 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-2"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Mindfulness and habitus in educating wise leaders</span><br />
This article brings together mindfulness and habitus theory in relation to developing wise leaders. In particular, the authors present new insights about the intersection of time, subjective and intersubjective experience, and mindfulness that are relevant to developing embodied wisdom in leaders.</p>
<p>The authors show that temporal competence is essential for shaping habitus and developing embodied wisdom. Further, and to extend theoretical understandings of mindfulness in leadership, the authors argue that temporal capabilities developed through mindfulness can foster embodied wisdom by creating a specific ‘wisdom habitus’ that includes values and ethics. The system of dispositions that comprise one’s habitus is, however, largely unconscious and implicit and the authors discuss how mindfulness renders habitus, including ethical conation accessible to development for the bodily ability to act wisely.</p>
<p>This article then establishes a framework that leadership development programs in business schools can adopt for understanding habitus and mindfulness to enable embodied wisdom to develop in leaders. Finally, the authors show that a mindfulness perspective offers valuable contributions to research on leadership.</p>
<p>David Rooney, Wendelin Küpers, David Pauleen &amp; Ekatarina Zhuravleva. 2021. <strong><em>A Developmental Model for Educating Wise Leaders: The Role of Mindfulness and Habitus in Creating Time for Embodying Wisdom.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-2 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type fusion-has-button-gradient tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04335-0"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 170(1), 181–194. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-4 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-4 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-3"><p><span class="tidbithdr">How does leader and employee humility influence employee citizenship and deviance behaviours? </span><br />
Various studies have recognised the importance of humility as a foundational aspect of virtuous leadership and have revealed the beneficial effects of leader humility on employee moral attitudes and behaviours.</p>
<p>However, these findings may overestimate the benefits of leader humility and overlook its potential costs. Integrating person–supervisor fit theory and balance theory with the humility literature, the authors employ a dyadic approach to consider supervisor and employee humility simultaneously.</p>
<p>The authors investigate whether and how the (in)congruence of supervisor and employee humility influences employee citizenship and deviance behaviours. The authors conducted a multilevel, multiphase, and multisource field study to test their hypotheses. The results of cross-level polynomial regression analyses revealed that when supervisors and employees were incongruent in humility, employees experienced higher levels of negative affect toward supervisors. Also, compared to those in low–low congruent dyads, employee negative affect toward supervisors was lower in high–high congruent dyads.</p>
<p>The results further revealed asymmetric incongruence effects: employees experienced the highest levels of negative affect toward supervisors when their own humility was lower than their supervisors’. In addition, the authors found that employee negative affect toward supervisors mediated the impacts of supervisor–employee (in)congruence in humility on employee organisational citizenship behaviour and counterproductive work behaviour.</p>
<p>Xin Qin, Xin Liu, Jacob A. Brown, Xiaoming Zheng &amp; Bradley P. Owens. 2021. <strong><em>Humility Harmonized? Exploring Whether and How Leader and Employee Humility (In)Congruence Influences Employee Citizenship and Deviance Behaviors.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-3 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04250-4"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 170(1), 147–165. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-5 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-5 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-4"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Supervisors’ values and ethics: A cross-national study</span><br />
In this study, the authors used the framework of institutional anomie theory (Messner and Rosenfeld in <em>Crime and the American dream</em>, Wadsworth, Delmont, CA, 2001; Rosenfeld and Messner in: Passas and Agnew (eds) <em>The future of anomie theory</em>, Northeastern University Press, Boston, 1997) to examine the relationship between supervisors’ ethics and their personal value orientation, including achievement and pecuniary materialism.</p>
<p>The authors further investigated whether these individual-level associations were moderated by societal factors consisting of income inequality, government efficiency, foreign competition, and technological advancement. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to analyze data of 16,464 supervisors from 42 nations obtained from the 2010–2014 wave of the World Values Survey.</p>
<p>Results showed that strong achievement value orientation was positively related to willingness to justify ethically suspect behaviours; government efficiency and technological advancement, respectively, had negative and positive moderating effects on this relationship. On the other hand, foreign competition had a positive moderating effect on the association between pecuniary materialism and ethicality.</p>
<p>Chung-wen Chen, Hsiu-Huei Yu, Kristine Velasquez Tuliao, Aditya Simha &amp; Yi-Ying Chang. 2021. <strong><em>Supervisors’ Value Orientations and Ethics: A Cross-National Analysis.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-4 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04254-0"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 170(1), 167–180. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-6 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-6 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-5"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Values and why some stories are sacred in organisations</span><br />
How and why could some stories be construed as sacred in organisations, and what functions does the sacred have in organisational values work? Research has shown how values can be made formative of a range of organisational purposes and forms but has underscored their performative, situated, and agentic nature.</p>
<p>The authors address that void by studying the sacred as a potentially salient yet under-researched realm of values work. Drawing on an ethnographic case study of a faith-based health care organisation and the ethical philosophy of Paul Ricoeur, the authors describe how the sacred is figured in two sets of tales that were lived and told with surprising intensity and consistency: the parable of the Good Samaritan and the tale of the legacy bestowed by the organisation’s founder.</p>
<p>The authors theorise how this figuring of the sacred in story and in action recasts values work from a centralised and unitary process to a two-way learning dialectic between the ongoing creative imitation of action and narrative. Values in the shape of stories of the sacred do not achieve their meaning as unchangeable cores or sanctioned beliefs. Rather, they come to life in a process of ongoing moral inquiry that co-evolves with moral agencies. In the latter regard, the sacred primarily becomes manifest in everyday work in the form of questioning and creative acts of care. People become moral agents when they feel and respond to the sacred in the call of the other.</p>
<p>Gry Espedal &amp; Arne Carlsen. 2021. <strong><em>Don’t Pass Them By: Figuring the Sacred in Organizational Values Work.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-5 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04266-w"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(4), 767–784. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div></p>The post <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-impact-of-leadership-on-ethics/">Research tidbits: Impact of leadership on ethics</a> first appeared on <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com">Institute for Sustainable Leadership</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research tidbits: Character and trust</title>
		<link>https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-character-and-trust/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doryanthus293]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 20:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Tidbits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trust]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/?p=6411</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What constitutes a ‘good’ professional?
How the dimensions of character and trust impact on managerial decision-making and behaviours.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-7 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-7 fusion_builder_column_1_4 1_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:25%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:7.68%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:7.68%;--awb-width-medium:25%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:7.68%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:7.68%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-image-element " style="text-align:left;--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h2_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h2_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h2_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h2_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h2_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h2_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h2_typography-letter-spacing);"><span class=" fusion-imageframe imageframe-dropshadow imageframe-2 hover-type-none" style="-webkit-box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="300" height="225" title="Image by Adam Radosavljevic from Pixabay" src="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/handshake-3298455_640-300x225.jpg" alt class="img-responsive wp-image-6413" srcset="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/handshake-3298455_640-200x150.jpg 200w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/handshake-3298455_640-400x300.jpg 400w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/handshake-3298455_640-600x450.jpg 600w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/handshake-3298455_640.jpg 640w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 400px" /></span></div></div></div><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-8 fusion_builder_column_3_4 3_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:75%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:2.56%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:2.56%;--awb-width-medium:75%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:2.56%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:2.56%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-title title fusion-title-2 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-one"><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-left fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div><span class="awb-title-spacer fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"></span><h1 class="fusion-title-heading title-heading-left fusion-responsive-typography-calculated" style="margin:0;--fontSize:28;line-height:1.5;"><h3>Our research tidbits this week considers how the dimensions of character and trust impact upon managerial decision-making and behaviours.</h3></h1><span class="awb-title-spacer"></span><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-right"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-8 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-9 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-6"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Engaged Buddhism and skillful managerial approaches</span><br />
As a transitional economy, Vietnam has undergone tremendous changes over recent decades within a ‘fusion’ context that blends both traditional and modern values from its complex history. However, few studies have explored how contemporary issues in the context of Vietnam have brought both obstacles and skillful initiatives to managerial approaches to doing business.</p>
<p>The authors draw on the concepts of social trust and institutional theory to explore how informal institutions such as religious forces can contribute to the development of individual trust and whether individuals are willing to extend trust beyond familial networks. The authors contribute to the notion of a moral conception of trust by exploring how Buddhism in particular has initiated distinctive managerial approaches in the context of Vietnam, in response to dilemmas of social trust.</p>
<p>The findings highlight that as an informal institution, engaged Buddhism yields significant impact on the formation of social trust. The authors carried out in-depth interviews in Vietnam with 33 organisational leaders who were Buddhist practitioners, using thematic analysis to elucidate the findings and arguments.</p>
<p>The study reveals how the incorporation of Buddhist principles has fostered context-sensitive, non-extreme, and reflexive managerial approaches to enhance morality as a response to social trust issues.</p>
<p><strong>Read this Open Access article online for free</strong></p>
<p>Mai Chi Vu &amp; Trang Tran. 2021. <strong><em>Trust Issues and Engaged Buddhism: The Triggers for Skillful Managerial Approaches</em>.</strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-6 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04273-x"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(1), 77–102.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-9 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-10 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-7"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Character-based judgement in the professional practice</span><br />
Dimensions of character are often overlooked in professional practice at the expense of the development of technical competence and operational efficiency. Drawing on philosophical accounts of virtue ethics and positive psychology, the present work attempts to elevate the role of ‘good’ character in the professional domain.</p>
<p>A ‘good’ professional is ideally one that exemplifies dimensions of character informed by sound judgement. A total of 2340 professionals, from five discrete professions, were profiled based on their valuation of qualities pertaining to character and judgement. Profile differences were subsequently examined in the self-reported experience of professional purpose towards a wider societal ‘good’.</p>
<p>Analysis of covariance, controlling for stage of career, revealed that professionals valuing character reported higher professional purpose than those overweighting the importance of judgement or valuing neither character nor judgement, F(3, 2054) = 7.92, p &lt; .001. No differences were found between the two groups valuing character, irrespective of whether judgement was valued simultaneously.</p>
<p>This profiling analysis of entry-level and in-service professionals, based on their holistic character composition, paves the way for fresh philosophical discussion regarding what constitutes a ‘good’ professional and the interplay between character and judgement. The empirical findings may be of substantive value in helping to recognise how the dimensions of character and judgement may impact upon practitioners’ professional purpose.</p>
<p><strong>Read this Open Access article online for free</strong></p>
<p>J James Arthur, Stephen R. Earl, Aidan P. Thompson &amp; Joseph W. Ward. 2021. <strong><em>The Value of Character-Based Judgement in the Professional Domain.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-7 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type fusion-has-button-gradient tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04269-7"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(2), 293–308. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-10 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-11 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-8"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Values and power distance in sustainable consumption</span><br />
As human consumption is one of the key contributors to environmental problems, it is increasingly urgent to promote sustainable consumption. Drawing on the agentic-communal model of power, this research explores how the psychological feeling of power influences consumers’ preference for green products.</p>
<p>The authors show that low power increases consumers’ preference for green (vs. conventional) products compared to high power (Studies 1a and 1b). Importantly, the authors identify two factors moderating the main effect of power on green consumption. Specifically, the authors find that the effect of power on green consumption is more salient among those with high green consumption values (Study 2). In addition, the effects of power are dynamic as a function of power distance belief (PDB), such that low power (vs. high power) promotes green consumption in the low-PDB context while high power (vs. low power) promotes green consumption in the high-PDB context (Study 3).</p>
<p>Taken together, these findings provide novel insights into understanding green consumption from the perspectives of social power, green values, and PDB. Besides contributing to the literature, the findings have significant implications for marketers and policy-makers in promoting green campaigns, bridging the attitude-behaviour gap, and building a more sustainable society.</p>
<p>Li Yan, Hean Tat Keh &amp; Xiaoyu Wang. 2021. <strong><em>Powering Sustainable Consumption: The Roles of Green Consumption Values and Power Distance Belief.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-8 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04295-5"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 499–516.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-11 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-12 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-9"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Emotional exhaustion and ethical behaviour and performance in salespersons</span><br />
Recent events and popularised stereotypes call into question the ethics of salesperson behaviours. Although prior research demonstrates that salespeople’s emotional exhaustion can have negative consequences for several job outcomes, little is known about the factors that can mitigate such relationships—particularly the relationship between emotional exhaustion and ethical behaviour.</p>
<p>To remedy this knowledge gap, the authors draw from self-control theory to propose a novel theoretical framework and develop hypotheses. These hypotheses are tested on a unique dataset consisting of survey data collected from 123 matched business-to-business (B2B) salesperson–manager dyads. The findings reveal that (1) emotional exhaustion is negatively associated with sales performance, (2) emotional exhaustion is negatively associated with ethical behaviours, (3) ethical behaviours are positively associated with sales performance, (4) ethical behaviours mediate emotional exhaustion’s negative effect on sales performance, (5) perceived supervisor support attenuates the negative association between emotional exhaustion and ethical behaviours, and (6) contrary to expectations, grit strengthens the negative association between emotional exhaustion and ethical behaviours.</p>
<p>As the authors show here, perceived supervisor support may attenuate the undesirable effects of emotional exhaustion on ethical behaviours and sales performance. The article’s broader contribution thus lies in its suggestion that managers pay special attention to these factors.</p>
<p>Moreover, factors such as grit can have unexpected and undesirable influences; therefore, the authors draw attention to the importance of scrutinising these interactions, even when the factors involved are almost universally touted as beneficial. Theoretical and practical implications of the research are discussed.</p>
<p>Bruno Lussier, Nathaniel N. Hartmann &amp; Willy Bolander. 2021. <strong><em>Curbing the Undesirable Effects of Emotional Exhaustion on Ethical Behaviors and Performance: A Salesperson–Manager Dyadic Approach.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-9 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04271-z"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics 169(4), 747–766.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-12 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-13 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-10"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Abusive supervision: Third parties’ Schadenfreude and work engagement</span><br />
Abusive supervision negatively affects its direct victims. However, recent studies have begun to explore how abusive supervision affects third parties (peer abusive supervision).</p>
<p>The authors use the emotion-based process model of schadenfreude as a basis to suggest that third parties will experience schadenfreude and increase their work engagement as a response to peer abusive supervision (PAS). Furthermore, the authors suggest that the context of competitive goal interdependence facilitates the indirect relationship between PAS and third parties’ work engagement on schadenfreude.</p>
<p>The authors use a mixed-method approach to test the hypotheses. Data from an experimental study conducted by facial expression analysis technology (Study 1, a 2 × 2 design, N = 104) and a multi‐wave field study (Study 2, N = 229) generally support the hypotheses. Overall, the study extends PAS literature and meaningfully informs practitioners who aim to promote ethical workplace environments.</p>
<p>Yueqiao Qiao, Zhe Zhang &amp; Ming Jia. 2021. <strong><em>Their Pain, Our Pleasure: How and When Peer Abusive Supervision Leads to Third Parties’ Schadenfreude and Work Engagement.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-10 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04315-4"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(4),  695–711. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-13 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-14 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-11"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Mindfulness and ethical behaviours</span><br />
While prior research suggests a link between mindfulness and ethical decision-making, most of the evidence for this link is correlational and refers to self-focused ethical behaviours. The paucity of experimental evidence, coupled with a lack of clarity on what mechanisms underlie the effect, limits our understanding of whether and how mindfulness might foster other-focused ethical behaviours.</p>
<p>In this research, the authors hypothesise that state mindfulness might promote other-focused ethical behaviours by increasing resourcefulness, which the authors define as a perceived state of resource abundance. Across four experimental studies, the authors report causal evidence for the effects of state mindfulness instantiated through brief mindful meditation exercises on other-focused ethical behaviours, including choice of fair-trade products (Study 1A), charitable giving (Study 1B), and volunteering (Study 1C and Study 2). Resourcefulness mediates the effects of mindfulness on other-focused ethical behaviours (Study 2). This work answers the call for more experimental research on mindfulness and its important implications for ethical decision-making.</p>
<p>Davide C. Orazi, Jiemiao Chen &amp; Eugene Y. Chan. 2021. <strong><em>To Erect Temples to Virtue: Effects of State Mindfulness on Other-Focused Ethical Behaviors.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-11 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04296-4"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default"> Journal of Business Ethics, 169(4), 785–798. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div></p>The post <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-character-and-trust/">Research tidbits: Character and trust</a> first appeared on <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com">Institute for Sustainable Leadership</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research tidbits: How can technology enhance business?</title>
		<link>https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-how-can-technology-enhance-business/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doryanthus293]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 17:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Tidbits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/?p=6400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Organisations that practice Sustainable Leadership engage heavily with technological innovation. Our research tidbits this week offers examples &amp; theories to investigate.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-14 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-15 fusion_builder_column_1_4 1_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:25%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:7.68%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:7.68%;--awb-width-medium:25%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:7.68%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:7.68%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-image-element " style="text-align:left;--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h2_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h2_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h2_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h2_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h2_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h2_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h2_typography-letter-spacing);"><span class=" fusion-imageframe imageframe-dropshadow imageframe-3 hover-type-none" style="-webkit-box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><img decoding="async" width="300" height="169" title="cog-wheels-2125178" src="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/cog-wheels-2125178-300x169.jpg" alt class="img-responsive wp-image-6402" srcset="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/cog-wheels-2125178-200x113.jpg 200w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/cog-wheels-2125178-400x225.jpg 400w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/cog-wheels-2125178-600x338.jpg 600w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/cog-wheels-2125178-800x450.jpg 800w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/cog-wheels-2125178-1200x675.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 400px" /></span></div></div></div><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-16 fusion_builder_column_3_4 3_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:75%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:2.56%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:2.56%;--awb-width-medium:75%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:2.56%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:2.56%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-title title fusion-title-3 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-one"><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-left fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div><span class="awb-title-spacer fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"></span><h1 class="fusion-title-heading title-heading-left fusion-responsive-typography-calculated" style="margin:0;--fontSize:28;line-height:1.5;"><h3>Innovation is one of the key performance drivers of Sustainable Leadership. Organisations that practice Sustainable Leadership engage heavily with technological innovation and our research tidbits this week offers some good examples and theories to investigate.</h3></h1><span class="awb-title-spacer"></span><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-right"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-15 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-17 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-12"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Managing business model innovation to create value for all stakeholders</span><br />
Managers and designers of innovative business models that are enabled by emerging technologies need to build legitimacy with ecosystem participants. Yet increasing legitimacy within the ecosystem raises competitors’ incentives to imitate the business model innovators, thereby adversely affecting the innovators’ ability to appropriate value.</p>
<p>The authors refer to this trade-off as the appropriation dilemma. The authors draw on institutional and resource-based perspectives to develop propositions about mitigating the appropriation dilemma and provide illustrations with a range of cases.</p>
<p>This theory development contributes to the technology management and business model innovation literatures by delineating how business model innovators can create value for all stakeholders and at the same time appropriate value through strategic business model design, a task that is particularly salient in the context of emerging technologies. The authors also strengthen the theoretical foundations of business model innovation research by grounding propositions about the strategic design of business models in resource-based theory and institutional theory.</p>
<p>Yuliya Snihur, Christoph Zott and Raphael (Raffi) Amit. 2021. <strong><em>Managing the Value Appropriation Dilemma in Business Model Innovation</em>.</strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-12 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2020.0113"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Strategy Science, 6(1), 22-38</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-16 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-18 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-13"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Profiting from enabling technologies across different domains</span><br />
How to profit from innovation has been an important question for both innovation scholars and practitioners over the years. It is certainly a relevant question for all types of technological innovation, including emerging ones.</p>
<p>David J. Teece’s profiting from innovation (PFI) framework [Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.] sets forth a theory of the relevant contingencies. However, Teece’s framework focuses on technologies with applications in specific domains. The authors focus on the question of how to profit from enabling technologies: technologies that are applicable across multiple domains.</p>
<p>The authors argue that capturing value in such circumstances is fundamentally different from profiting from less-enabling technologies and raises new issues with respect to the relevant business models and public policies. This paper’s contribution is threefold. It formally revises and extends the original PFI framework to include the case of enabling technologies, it provides empirical evidence to support the distinction between profiting from enabling and profiting from narrower “discrete” technologies, and it generates perspectives on the appropriate business models for these technologies and discusses related public policy implications, in light of the fact that the share of the benefits the innovator can capture is likely to be even smaller for enabling than for discrete technologies.</p>
<p>Alfonso Gambardella, Sohvi Heaton, Elena Novelli and David J. Teece. 2021. <strong><em>Profiting from Enabling Technologies?</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-13 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type fusion-has-button-gradient tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2020.0119"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Strategy Science, 6(1), 75-90</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-17 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-19 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-14"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Technology’s value creation: Emerging, enabling, embedding</span><br />
Technology has been conceptualised in many ways, ranging from scientific and engineering knowledge to business enterprise “production functions” to physical artifacts that fulfill a particular purpose. These different conceptualisations underscore technology as a multifaceted construct that encompasses production know-how, problem solving, and functionality.</p>
<p>Although new technologies present significant opportunities for value creation, the realisation of those opportunities varies across firms, industries, and technologies over time. An understanding of the sources of this variation can help firms with their strategic decision making and offer guidance to policy makers on how they can facilitate technological progress to help spur economic growth. It requires recognising the important distinction between invention and innovation that goes back to Schumpeter (1934). Whereas inventions represent scientific discoveries that encompass new knowledge within a technological domain, innovation represents the subsequent commercialisation of those inventions so as to create value—and, hopefully, capture some of it as well.</p>
<p>Therefore, situating the technology in its commercialisation context and identifying the features that can have a significant impact on its value creation are pivotal to understanding how firms and policy makers can contribute to technological progress and generate superior performance.</p>
<p><strong>Read this Open Access article online for free.</strong></p>
<p>Rahul Kapoor and David J. Teece. 2021. <strong><em>Three Faces of Technology’s Value Creation: Emerging, Enabling, Embedding.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-14 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2021.0124"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Strategy Science, 6(1),1-4</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-18 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-20 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-15"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Enabling technologies and the role of private firms</span><br />
Investments in enabling technologies—including the fifth-generation technology standard for broadband cellular networks (5G), artificial intelligence (AI), and light detection and ranging (LIDAR) technology—are important strategic decisions for firms.</p>
<p>This paper asks how inventions that private firms developed with (versus without) public-sector partners differ in their enabling technology trajectory. Using a novel method of machine learning matching, the authors compare patented technologies generated from more than 30,000 public–private relationships with comparable technologies invented by private firms alone during a 21-year period.</p>
<p>To measure the enabling potential of a technology, the authors introduce a new enabling technology index. The findings show that private-firm relationships with the public sector—in particular cooperative agreements and grants with mission agencies (National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Department of Defense)—are likely starting points for enabling technology trajectories. The authors thus put a spotlight on organisational arrangements that combine the breadth of exploration (agreements, grants) with deep exploitation in a particular domain (mission agency). A key contribution is a better understanding of the types of private-firm efforts that are associated with enabling technologies.</p>
<p>The authors also challenge the common assumption that enabling technologies have their origins only in public-sector projects and show how private firms are involved. This paper’s significant contribution is to show how private firms can change evolution of ecosystems through technology development.</p>
<p>Jason M. Rathje and Riitta Katila. 2021. <strong><em>Enabling Technologies and the Role of Private Firms: A Machine Learning Matching Analysis.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-15 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2020.0112"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Strategy Science, 6(1),5-21</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-19 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-21 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-16"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Choosing technology in start-ups</span><br />
A central premise of research in the strategic management of innovation is that start-ups are able to leverage emerging technological trajectories as a source of competitive advantage. But, if the potential for a technology is given by the fundamental character of a given technological trajectory, then why does entrepreneurial strategy matter? Or, put another way, if the evolution of technology is largely shaped by the strategic choices entrepreneurs make, then why do technological trajectories exhibit systematic patterns such as the technology S-curve?</p>
<p>Taking a choice-based perspective, this paper illuminates the choices confronting a start-up choosing their technology by resolving the paradox of the technology S-curve through a reformulation of the foundations of the technology S-curve. Specifically, the authors reconceptualise the technology S-curve not as a technological given but as an envelope of potential outcomes reflecting differing strategic choices by the entrepreneur in exploration versus exploitation.</p>
<p>Taking this lens, the authors are able to clarify the role of technological uncertainty on start-up strategy, the impact of constraints on technological evolution, and how technology choice is shaped by the possibility of imitation. The findings suggest that staged exploration may stall innovation as a result of the replacement effect, increasing the strategic importance of commitment.</p>
<p>Joshua S. Gans, Michael Kearney, Erin L. Scott and Scott Stern. 2021. <strong><em>Choosing Technology: An Entrepreneurial Strategy Approach.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-16 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2020.0115"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Strategy Science, 6(1), 39-53</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-20 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-22 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-17"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Using increasing abstraction to accelerate adoption of complex technologies</span><br />
Many new technologies are complex and embody high levels of technical sophistication, and applying them should require significant knowledge and experience. Yet, the rapid adoption and incorporation of these technologies into other innovations seems inconsistent with the expertise needed to make them work.</p>
<p>In this paper, the authors propose increasing levels of abstraction as a strategy for speeding the adoption of new technologies. Higher-level abstractions package complexity in ways that makes them easier to understand and recombine, and they decrease the resources needed by firms to deploy sophisticated technical know-how. Increasing the level of abstraction is a way to push forward the innovative frontier by making such difficult-to-use technologies readily accessible to other innovators.</p>
<p>Although this framing has been used in engineering and software development to describe modular encapsulation and cumulative innovation, the authors propose its use in the management literature to describe more broadly the uptake of new technologies and their facile recombination. This framing casts a different light on cumulative innovation and exposes new managerial questions to explore.</p>
<p>Willy C. Shih. 2021. <strong><em>Increasing the Level of Abstraction as a Strategy for Accelerating the Adoption of Complex Technologies.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-17 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2020.0116"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Strategy Science, 6(1), 54-61</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-21 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-23 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-18"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Managing uncertainty surrounding emerging technologies</span><br />
Emerging technologies, while offering enormous potential for economic growth, carry a high degree of uncertainty regarding whether and when that potential may be realised. How can firms evaluate the uncertainty surrounding an emerging technology?</p>
<p>To address this question, the authors offer a structured approach that unbundles the uncertainty surrounding emerging technologies, incorporating both supply- and demand-side factors. These include the focal technology itself, the potential market applications, the users adopting the technology, the ecosystem of activities that support the technology’s value creation, and the business model with which the technology is being commercialised. The authors further consider that the uncertainty surrounding each of these sources may not be resolved in a vacuum, but, rather, that it may interact with other sources of uncertainty in a pooled, sequential, or reciprocal way.</p>
<p>Such a structured approach of evaluating uncertainty can help firms and managers in terms of the cognitive processes and the managerial practices and provide micro-foundations for dynamic managerial capabilities. The authors illustrate the applicability of the framework for two emerging technologies—gene therapy and autonomous vehicles—and how the framework can be integrated with prominent managerial practices for managing uncertainty.</p>
<p>Rahul Kapoor and Thomas Klueter. 2021. <strong><em>Unbundling and Managing Uncertainty Surrounding Emerging Technologies.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-18 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2020.0118"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Strategy Science, 6(1), 62-74</span></a></div></div></div></div></div></p>The post <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-how-can-technology-enhance-business/">Research tidbits: How can technology enhance business?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com">Institute for Sustainable Leadership</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research tidbits: Dealing with corporate irresponsibility</title>
		<link>https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-dealing-with-corporate-irresponsibility/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doryanthus293]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 18:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Tidbits]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/?p=6389</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dealing with corporate irresponsibility]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-22 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-24 fusion_builder_column_1_4 1_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:25%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:7.68%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:7.68%;--awb-width-medium:25%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:7.68%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:7.68%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-image-element " style="text-align:left;--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h2_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h2_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h2_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h2_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h2_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h2_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h2_typography-letter-spacing);"><span class=" fusion-imageframe imageframe-dropshadow imageframe-4 hover-type-none" style="-webkit-box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><img decoding="async" width="640" height="448" title="Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay" src="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/eye-2926215_640.jpg" alt class="img-responsive wp-image-6113" srcset="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/eye-2926215_640-200x140.jpg 200w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/eye-2926215_640-400x280.jpg 400w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/eye-2926215_640-600x420.jpg 600w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/eye-2926215_640.jpg 640w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 400px" /></span></div></div></div><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-25 fusion_builder_column_3_4 3_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:75%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:2.56%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:2.56%;--awb-width-medium:75%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:2.56%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:2.56%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-title title fusion-title-4 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-one"><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-left fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div><span class="awb-title-spacer fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"></span><h1 class="fusion-title-heading title-heading-left fusion-responsive-typography-calculated" style="margin:0;--fontSize:28;line-height:1.5;"><h3>Our research tidbits this week looks at the <span class="TextRun BCX0 SCXW73241773" lang="EN-AU" xml:lang="EN-AU" data-contrast="none"><span class="NormalTextRun BCX0 SCXW73241773" data-ccp-parastyle="heading 1">conditions which may give rise to irresponsible behavio</span></span><span class="TextRun BCX0 SCXW73241773" lang="EN-AU" xml:lang="EN-AU" data-contrast="none"><span class="NormalTextRun BCX0 SCXW73241773" data-ccp-parastyle="heading 1">u</span></span><span class="TextRun BCX0 SCXW73241773" lang="EN-AU" xml:lang="EN-AU" data-contrast="none"><span class="NormalTextRun BCX0 SCXW73241773" data-ccp-parastyle="heading 1">r of organ</span></span><span class="TextRun BCX0 SCXW73241773" lang="EN-AU" xml:lang="EN-AU" data-contrast="none"><span class="NormalTextRun BCX0 SCXW73241773" data-ccp-parastyle="heading 1">is</span></span><span class="TextRun BCX0 SCXW73241773" lang="EN-AU" xml:lang="EN-AU" data-contrast="none"><span class="NormalTextRun BCX0 SCXW73241773" data-ccp-parastyle="heading 1">ations and what can be done to mitigate.</span></span></h3></h1><span class="awb-title-spacer"></span><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-right"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-23 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-26 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-19"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Paths of corporate irresponsibility</span><br />
In this qualitative meta-analysis, the author analyses corporate irresponsibility as an emergent organisational process. Organisations enacting irresponsible practices rely not only on a particular form of a process path, but on how this process path evolves within the organisation.</p>
<p>To achieve a better understanding of this process path, the author conducted a qualitative meta-analysis drawn from 20 published cases of irresponsible organisations. The author explores how and under which conditions irresponsible behaviour of organisations arises, develops, and changes over time. The process path of corporate irresponsibility relies on the interaction of multiple levels of analysis and its temporal occurrence, resulting in either path dependency or path creation. Based on the empirical findings of the evolving phenomena, this study focuses on three phases of corporate irresponsibility: institutionalisation, problematisation, and adaptation.</p>
<p>The process of corporate irresponsibility can take two distinct paths, the reactive (organisations becoming locked-in in the path of corporate irresponsibility), and the proactive (organisations radically changing and breaking their path of corporate irresponsibility).</p>
<p>This study contributes to the corporate irresponsibility literature by offering new insights into, first, a processual and more interactional approach to corporate irresponsibility that accounts for interdependencies on the different levels of each phase, and second, the self-reinforcing mechanisms and explanatory patterns of corporate irresponsibility leading to path dependency or path creation.</p>
<p>Jill A. Küberling-Jost. 2021. <strong><em>Paths of Corporate Irresponsibility: A Dynamic Process</em>.</strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-19 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04263-z"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 579–601.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-24 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-27 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-20"><p><span class="tidbithdr">To blow or not to blow the whistle?</span><br />
Whistleblowers who need to decide whether or not they should report wrongdoing usually experience several anxieties and pressures before making a final decision. As whistleblowers continue to attract the attention of a wide range of stakeholders, more research is necessary to understand the effects of the perceived seriousness of threats (PST) and perceived seriousness of wrongdoing (PSW), as well as the effect of the rationalisation process on the intention to blow the whistle.</p>
<p>The authors make the original proposal that the rationalisation process can affect how PST and PSW trigger whistleblowing intentions. The authors tested their model using employees of tax offices operating in an emerging economy.</p>
<p>The authors suggest several research findings, which can be summarised as follows: (i) PST reduces individuals’ intention to blow the whistle. That is, the greater the threat perceived by whistleblowers, the higher the likelihood they will choose to remain silent; (ii) the authors find evidence of a positive relationship between PSW and whistleblowing intention, whereby PSW increases individuals’ intention to blow the whistle. That is, the more serious the wrongdoing perceived by potential whistleblowers, the more likely they are to choose to blow the whistle; and (iii) the authors find evidence of the important role of rationalisation in moderating the relationships between PST, PSW, and whistleblowing intention.</p>
<p>The implications of these findings for business ethics scholars, managers, and end-users interested in whistleblowing are also presented.</p>
<p>Hengky Latan, Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour &amp; Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour. 2021. <strong><em>To Blow or Not to Blow the Whistle: The Role of Rationalization in the Perceived Seriousness of Threats and Wrongdoing.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-20 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type fusion-has-button-gradient tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04287-5"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 517–535. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-25 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-28 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-21"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Managing conflict of interests in professional accounting firms</span><br />
This paper synthesises the research related to managing conflict of interests in professional accounting firms. The main purpose is to provide information about the current state of knowledge on this topic and to highlight the areas requiring further research.</p>
<p>The extant research has been reviewed by developing a framework through the integration of Risk Management Framework by ISO 31000:2009 and the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants. Specifically, literature has been classified across the establishment of context, assessment, treatment, control and monitoring of conflict of interests. The literature reveals that there is a lack of understanding about how the conflict of interests operates at the level of an individual accounting professional.</p>
<p>Addressing this gap will help to develop behavioural interventions for strengthening the professionals’ independence in fact and, thereby, facilitating the management of conflict of interests. The key message this synthesised research provides for professional accounting firms and the regulators is that, for effective management of conflict of interests, behavioural interventions should be informed by the professionals’ unconscious (automatic) as well as their conscious (controlled) cognitive processes.</p>
<p>This study is the first one to view the conflict of interests in a professional accounting environment through the lens of behavioural risk management. Moreover, the framework adopted for reviewing the extant literature provides a comprehensive view of the issues surrounding the ineffective management of the conflict of interests.</p>
<p>Maria Ishaque. 2021. <strong><em>Managing Conflict of Interests in Professional Accounting Firms: A Research Synthesis.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-21 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04284-8"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 537–555. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-26 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-29 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-22"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Practice sense, empathy games, and dilemmas in tax enforcement</span></p>
<p>Tax administrators are empowered by the state to secure compliance with tax obligations. Enforcing compliance on the ground is complex, and street-level administrators often engage in the “art of the possible,” leading to dilemmas in the field.</p>
<p>This paper examines tax administrators’ practices with regard to Jamaican property tax defaulters with outstanding tax liabilities in excess of 3 years. Drawing on interviews with tax administrators and other key agents, the authors find that tax administrators reposition themselves from objective enforcers to empathising officials engaging in schemes of action, doing what they can do rather than what they should do. This is a practical-sense approach to securing compliance.</p>
<p>The authors identify two forms of empathy, assimilated and cynical, and conclude that administrators’ empathetic identification with defaulters does not necessarily arise solely from concern for social cohesion, or inter-subjective compassion, but also sometimes from self-interest.</p>
<p><strong>Read this Open Access article online for free.</strong></p>
<p>Carlene Beth Wynter &amp; Lynne Oats. 2021. <strong><em>Knock, Knock: The Taxman’s at Your Door! Practice Sense, Empathy Games, and Dilemmas in Tax Enforcement.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-22 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04300-x"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(2), 279–292. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-27 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-30 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-23"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Moral responsibility for systemic financial risk</span><br />
This paper argues that some of the major theories in current business ethics fail to provide an adequate account of moral responsibility for the creation of systemic financial risk.</p>
<p>Using the trading of credit default swaps (CDS) during the 2008 financial crisis as a case study, the author formulates three challenges that these theories must address: the problem of risk imposition, the problem of unstructured collective harm and the problem of limited knowledge. These challenges will be used to work out key shortcomings of stakeholder approaches and Integrative Social Contracts Theory.</p>
<p>The author argues that pluralist connection models used in political theory can help to overcome these shortcomings. Adopting an approach based on these models shows that financial institutions incur obligations in five main areas: managing their own risk profile; remedying some of the harms caused by financial crises; supporting the development of better epistemic methods; curbing the transmission and amplification of initial losses; and instigating structural reforms</p>
<p>Jakob Moggia. 2021. <strong><em>Moral Responsibility for Systemic Financial Risk.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-23 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04288-4"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 461–473. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div></p>The post <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-dealing-with-corporate-irresponsibility/">Research tidbits: Dealing with corporate irresponsibility</a> first appeared on <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com">Institute for Sustainable Leadership</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research tidbits: Communication matters</title>
		<link>https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-communication-matters/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doryanthus293]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 18:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Tidbits]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/?p=6379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The importance of communication and getting the tone right. 
See this week's research tibits for interesting examples.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-28 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-31 fusion_builder_column_1_4 1_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:25%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:7.68%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:7.68%;--awb-width-medium:25%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:7.68%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:7.68%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-image-element " style="text-align:left;--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h2_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h2_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h2_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h2_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h2_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h2_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h2_typography-letter-spacing);"><span class=" fusion-imageframe imageframe-dropshadow imageframe-5 hover-type-none" style="-webkit-box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><img decoding="async" width="640" height="403" title="Image by Gordon Johnson from Pixabay0" src="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/social-media-3846597_640.png" alt class="img-responsive wp-image-6382" srcset="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/social-media-3846597_640-200x126.png 200w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/social-media-3846597_640-400x252.png 400w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/social-media-3846597_640-600x378.png 600w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/social-media-3846597_640.png 640w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 400px" /></span></div></div></div><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-32 fusion_builder_column_3_4 3_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:75%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:2.56%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:2.56%;--awb-width-medium:75%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:2.56%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:2.56%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-title title fusion-title-5 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-one"><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-left fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div><span class="awb-title-spacer fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"></span><h1 class="fusion-title-heading title-heading-left fusion-responsive-typography-calculated" style="margin:0;--fontSize:28;line-height:1.5;"><h3>This week, our research articles cover the importance of communication and getting the tone right. For example when issuing apologies or CSR ideals, these articles provide interesting examples.</h3></h1><span class="awb-title-spacer"></span><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-right"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-29 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-33 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-24"><p><span class="tidbithdr">A dynamic review of the emergence of CSR communication</span><br />
Recent reviews show a rapid increase in the corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication literature. However, while mapping the literature and the field of CSR communication, they do not fully capture the evolutionary character of this emerging interdisciplinary endeavour.</p>
<p>This paper seeks to fill this gap by presenting a follow-up study of the CSR communication literature from a dynamic perspective, which focuses on micro-discursive changes in the field. A bibliometric approach and frame theory are used to examine (dis)continuities in the development of field &#8216;frames&#8217; in three consecutive periods between 2002 and 2016.</p>
<p>The article highlights the growing fragmentation of the CSR communication field over time and the existence of 11 distinct frames during the field&#8217;s emergence, whereby the two most prominent in the three time periods are the reporting and business case frames. Regardless, they are subjected to discursive changes as well. For example, they become split into stakeholder-focused, business case and institutionalisation frame and contested by the constitutive logic, respectively.</p>
<p>The paper argues that interdisciplinary fields like CSR communication can rarely exist without contestation. It also shows that micro-framing processes such as fragmentation, merging and extension visibly shape the identified field frames and the overall discursive dynamic of the CSR communication field while investigating their value for sustaining the field&#8217;s polyphonic state and further development. The study findings suggest that additional cross-fertilisation processes between the CSR communication literature and sustainability and digital communication research hold the potential to influence the next stage of the field&#8217;s discursive evolution.</p>
<p>Verk, Nataša, Golob, Urša and Podnar, Klement. 2021. <strong><em>A Dynamic Review of the Emergence of Corporate Social Responsibility Communication</em>.</strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-24 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04232-6"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 168 (3), 491-515.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-30 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-34 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-25"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Is nonprofit organisation communication risky?</span><br />
This paper highlights the role of nonprofit organisations in communicating risk. Nonprofit organisations have emerged as vital actors in not just working toward the benefit of human welfare and bettering society, but also making society aware of hazards or risks that exist.</p>
<p>The approach used to communicate risk is a critical element that ultimately will lead to the success or failure of a nonprofit organisation&#8217;s mission and objectives. Finding ways to communicate risk is a challenging task that requires being able to first make people aware of the significance or value of an act/idea or existing state, communicating the danger at hand, and then drawing on the causal relationship between the two. Although a major function, the literature on risk communication of nonprofit organisations is scarce.</p>
<p>This article draws on the relational theory of risk, which includes three elements: object at risk (value), risk object (danger), and association (Boholm and Corvellec 2011). The authors recommend that the best way for nonprofits-and in some instances other organisations-that need to communicate risk is to communicate this risk through the use of narratives.</p>
<p><strong>Read this full-text article online for free.</strong></p>
<p>Cadet, Fabienne and Carroll, Ryall. 2019. <strong><em>Nonprofit Organization Communication: Risky Business.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-25 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type fusion-has-button-gradient tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.stjohns.edu/sites/default/files/2019-02/review-of-business-391_january_2019.pdf"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Review of Business, 39(1), 1-14. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-31 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-35 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-26"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Incongruence in CSR messaging</span><br />
Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) appears to be mutually beneficial for companies and consumers, the modern marketplace has left both parties in vulnerable positions. Consumers are increasingly subjected to incongruent CSR messages such as greenwashing, while companies are trapped in a strategic positioning dilemma with regard to how to most effectively and ethically approach CSR communication.</p>
<p>This has led some companies to instead adopt a strategically silent approach, such as greenhushing. To capture this CSR positioning dilemma and test the positioning effects on consumers’ attributions, this study applies attribution theory to conceptualise four distinct CSR positions (uniform, discreet, washing, and apathetic) which reflect varying combinations of congruence or incongruence between a company’s external CSR communication and its actual internal CSR actions.</p>
<p>Using an online experiment, the effects of the CSR positions on consumer attributions for intrinsic and extrinsic CSR motivations and purchase intentions were tested across three CSR domains: environmental; labour; and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) inclusion.</p>
<p>Overall, the findings attest to the significant effect of internal–external congruence-based CSR positioning on how consumers respond to CSR communication. Importantly, the results indicate that discreet positioning is perceived similarly to uniform positioning, while misleading and unethical tactics such as CSR-washing are sure to backfire. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.</p>
<p>Whitney Ginder, Wi-Suk Kwon &amp; Sang-Eun Byun. 2021. <strong><em>Effects of Internal–External Congruence-Based CSR Positioning: An Attribution Theory Approach.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-26 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04282-w"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(2), 355–369. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-32 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-36 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-27"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Do human resource disclosures reflect organisational priorities towards labour?</span><br />
Our study analyses the nature, quality and extent of human resource disclosures (HRDs) of UK Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 100 firms by relying on a novel disclosure index measuring the depth and breadth of disclosures. Contextually, the authors focus on the 5-year period following the then Labour government’s attempts to encourage firms to formally report on their human resource management practices and to foster deeper employer–employee engagement.</p>
<p>First, the authors evaluate the degree to which companies report comprehensively (or substantively) on a number of HRD items that the authors classify as “procedural” or “sustainable.” Second, the authors hypothesise that a company’s employee relation ideology (using a proxy to measure a company’s level of “unitarism”) is positively associated with HRD.</p>
<p>The results indicate that: (i) whilst there has been an increase in the breadth of HRD in terms of procedural and sustainable items being disclosed, the evolution towards a more comprehensive and in-depth form of HRD remains rather limited; and (ii) there is a positive association between a company’s employee relation ideology (unitarism) and the level of HRD. Theoretically, the authors conceive of HRD both as a reflection of an organisation’s orientation towards a key stakeholder (unitarist relations with labour) and a legitimacy seeking exercise at a time of changing societal conditions.</p>
<p>The authors contribute to the scant literature on the extent and determinants of HRD since prior research tends to subsume employee-related disclosures within the broader concept of social, ethical or intellectual capital disclosures. The authors also propose a disclosure checklist to underpin future HRD research.</p>
<p><strong>Read this Open Access article online for free.</strong></p>
<p>K. Vithana, T. Soobaroyen &amp; C. G. Ntim. 2021. <strong><em>Human Resource Disclosures in UK Corporate Annual Reports: To What Extent Do These Reflect Organisational Priorities Towards Labour?</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-27 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04289-3"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 475–497.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-33 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-37 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-28"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Surviving a crisis</span><br />
This research examines how one’s construal level of a crisis differs by crisis type, and how the interplay of crisis type (self-threatening vs. society-threatening) and apology appeal type (emotional vs. informational) impacts the effectiveness of apology messages in a corporate crisis context.</p>
<p>Findings indicate that one’s mental construal toward a crisis varies by crisis type, with a self-threatening crisis leading to a lower level of construal than a society-threatening one. Findings further suggest that in a society-threatening crisis condition, an informational apology was more effective than an emotional one. However, in a self-threatening crisis condition, there was no significant difference between two different message types.</p>
<p>These findings offer valuable guidelines for developing effective crisis response strategy.</p>
<p>So Young Lee, Yoon Hi Sung, Dongwon Choi &amp; Dong Hoo Kim. 2021. <strong><em>Surviving a Crisis: How Crisis Type and Psychological Distance Can Inform Corporate Crisis Responses.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-28 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04233-5"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 168(4), 795–811. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-34 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-38 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-29"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Student perceptions of the hidden curriculum in responsible management education</span><br />
This exploratory study analyses the extent of alignment between the formal and hidden curricula in responsible management education (RME).</p>
<p>Based on case study evidence of a school that has signed the United Nations Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME), the authors found poor alignment between the school’s explicit RME claims and students’ lived experiences. While the formal curriculum signalled to students that RME was important, the school’s hidden curriculum sent a number of tacit messages that led students to question the relevance and applicability of responsible management.</p>
<p>The tacit messages that students received occurred along three “message sites” related to (a) how the formal curriculum was delivered, (b) how students and lecturers interacted, and (c) how the school was governed. On the basis of these findings the authors develop a proposition that can guide further research in this area, i.e., the connotative level of language use is an important site of misalignments between what lecturers say in relation to RME (e.g., in a syllabus) and how students interpret the meaning of their lecturers’ words.</p>
<p>The authors also discuss further implications of the findings for strengthening the alignment between schools’ formal RME claims and their hidden curriculum.</p>
<p>Catharina Høgdal, Andreas Rasche, Dennis Schoeneborn &amp; Levinia Scotti. 2021. <strong><em>Exploring Student Perceptions of the Hidden Curriculum in Responsible Management Education.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-29 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04221-9"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 168(1), 173–193. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div></p>The post <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-communication-matters/">Research tidbits: Communication matters</a> first appeared on <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com">Institute for Sustainable Leadership</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research tidbits: Shared leadership</title>
		<link>https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-shared-leadership/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doryanthus293]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 19:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Tidbits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organisational culture]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/?p=6372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What is shared leadership? See our research tidbits for the latest studies]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-35 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-39 fusion_builder_column_1_4 1_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:25%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:7.68%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:7.68%;--awb-width-medium:25%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:7.68%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:7.68%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-image-element " style="text-align:left;--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h2_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h2_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h2_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h2_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h2_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h2_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h2_typography-letter-spacing);"><span class=" fusion-imageframe imageframe-dropshadow imageframe-6 hover-type-none" style="-webkit-box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><img decoding="async" width="640" height="427" title="Image by Joseph Mucira from Pixabay" src="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/business-meeting-5395567_640.jpg" alt class="img-responsive wp-image-6051" srcset="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/business-meeting-5395567_640-200x133.jpg 200w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/business-meeting-5395567_640-400x267.jpg 400w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/business-meeting-5395567_640-600x400.jpg 600w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/business-meeting-5395567_640.jpg 640w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 400px" /></span></div></div></div><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-40 fusion_builder_column_3_4 3_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:75%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:2.56%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:2.56%;--awb-width-medium:75%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:2.56%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:2.56%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-title title fusion-title-6 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-one"><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-left fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div><span class="awb-title-spacer fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"></span><h1 class="fusion-title-heading title-heading-left fusion-responsive-typography-calculated" style="margin:0;--fontSize:28;line-height:1.5;"><h3>This week&#8217;s research tidbits pulls together recent research offering insights into the phenomenon of shared leadership.</h3></h1><span class="awb-title-spacer"></span><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-right"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-36 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-41 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-30"><p><span class="tidbithdr">What do we know about shared leadership?</span><br />
Many organisations are encouraging a shared leadership approach that meets the increased complexity of today’s working environment. It is therefore imperative for researchers to clearly comprehend the mechanism of shared leadership in teams.<br />
Contributing to the burgeoning research in the field of shared leadership, this study aims to advance our understanding along the many dimensions of the shared leadership phenomenon: its antecedents, moderators, and consequences.</p>
<p>In this article, the authors provide a critical and comprehensive analysis of the extant literature and generate an integrated framework that presents seven hypotheses and five research questions. The authors then empirically test this framework via a systematic meta-analysis from 40 studies (team n = 3,019).</p>
<p>Significantly, the findings reveal that the internal team environment and team heterogeneity are positively related to the emergence of shared leadership in teams. Moreover, the authors confirm the positive relationship between shared leadership and team outcomes. The analysis also highlights how intragroup trust and task interdependence significantly moderate the shared leadership–team outcomes relations, with higher correlations observed in greater levels of intragroup trust, as well as larger levels of task interdependence.</p>
<p>The authors also find the moderating effect of shared leadership measurement methods in such relations. Specifically, there is a stronger relationship when shared leadership is measured with social network analysis, rather than aggregating approaches. Overall, the study brings valuable insights into the shared leadership area and provides clear directions for future research.</p>
<p>Wu, Qiong, Cormican, Kathryn and Chen, Guoquan. 2020. <strong><em>A Meta-Analysis of Shared Leadership: Antecedents, Consequences, and Moderators</em>.</strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-30 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1548051818820862"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Leadership &amp; Organizational Studies, 27(1), 49-64. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-37 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-42 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-31"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Shared leadership in uncertainty</span><br />
Research presented in this article advances existing work on shared leadership and organisational sensemaking by an empirical demonstration of the organising properties of leadership in daily instances of uncertainty.</p>
<p>Drawing on conversation analysis combined with ethnographic data collected during 12-month fieldwork, this article spells out the conversational mechanisms and discursive practices used by leadership actors in the process of sensemaking directed towards organisationally relevant goals.</p>
<p>Through a fine-grain analysis of an extended troubles-telling sequence in a particular meeting encounter, this study shows how conversation analysis–inspired research can be used to add a more nuanced understanding of a substantive area of social life, such as shared leadership which is achieved in interaction and which involves various leadership actors, regardless of their hierarchical positions and organisational roles.</p>
<p><strong>Read this Open Access article online for free.</strong></p>
<p>Gyuzel Gadelshina. 2020. <strong><em>Shared leadership: Struggles over meaning in daily instances of uncertainty.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-31 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type fusion-has-button-gradient tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1742715020935748"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Leadership, 16(5), 522-545</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-38 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-43 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-32"><p><span class="tidbithdr">How is leadership shared in a professional hierarchy?</span><br />
While there is growing recognition of leadership as a collective phenomenon, the question of how leadership is shared in the context of hierarchical asymmetry has been neglected in the collective leadership literature. This article addresses this gap by examining how sharing leadership is negotiated in team interactions that are steeped in asymmetry deriving from the professional hierarchy.</p>
<p>Adopting a leadership-in-interaction approach, the authors draw on fine-grained analysis of observed interactions on interprofessional teams from two health care organisations to compare the discursive strategies used by professionals in a superior hierarchical position to the ones used by those in inferior positions to share leadership. These strategies are organised into a matrix of interactional moves that resist or enact the professional hierarchy. Empirical vignettes are provided to demonstrate how sharing leadership and hierarchical leadership can be co-present and even intertwined in an interaction.</p>
<p>The authors show that leadership is shared (or not) as a result of how the professional hierarchy gets negotiated in interactions. More specifically, the authors conclude that the sharing of leadership in this context tends to occur prior to decision making, especially around problem formulation, if the interactional climate allows. Furthermore, it requires concrete effort: Those in superior positions of influence mindfully relax the hierarchy whereas those in inferior positions create moments of sharing leadership through resistance and struggle.</p>
<p>Stephanie Fox &amp; Mariline Comeau-Vallée. 2020. <strong><em>The negotiation of sharing leadership in the context of professional hierarchy: Interactions on interprofessional teams.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-32 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1742715020917817"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Leadership, 16(5), 568-591. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-39 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-44 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-33"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Emergent, distributed, and orchestrated leadership depends on how you frame it</span><br />
Leadership scholars are beginning to understand leadership as a distributed phenomenon, produced in interaction and emerging in social situations. Although this perspective has contributed to understanding leadership processes in more detail, it has also been noted that its proponents have largely neglected power and asymmetrical hierarchical relations.</p>
<p>In this paper, the author addresses these issues by drawing on Erving Goffman’s notion of frame analysis. Through detailed analysis of the interactions in a core-values session, the author shows how leadership processes that appear to be distributed and emergent from the participants’ framework appear orchestrated when understood from the manager’s framework.</p>
<p>The analysis reveals how power asymmetries operate in the framing of the situation, and how the experience of leadership differs among participants. Talk, text, tools, and movements in time and space all contribute to establish frameworks, and differences in access to these modalities show power asymmetries.</p>
<p>The paper highlights how the experience of leadership is framed and how power asymmetries constitute this framing. It thereby contributes to multimodal, constructivist theories of distributed leadership by showing how leadership is simultaneously emergent, distributed, and orchestrated.</p>
<p>Johan Alvehus. 2019. <strong><em>Emergent, distributed, and orchestrated: Understanding leadership through frame analysis.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-33 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1742715018773832"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Leadership, 15(5), 535-554. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-40 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-45 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-34"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Shared leadership development and team performance</span><br />
The present study offers new theoretical insights into the dynamics of shared leadership. Integrating arguments from shared leadership and team development theory, the authors examine how shared leadership changes over the course of a project team&#8217;s life cycle and how this pattern of change relates to team performance. Guided by shared leadership theory and project team literature, the authors also explore team‐level factors, which may alter the pattern of shared leadership development.</p>
<p>In particular, the authors propose that in project teams shared leadership develops in a nonuniform way, approximating an inverted U‐shaped pattern, increasing early in the team&#8217;s life cycle, peaking around the midpoint, and then decreasing in the later phase. In turn, this development pattern relates positively to team performance.</p>
<p>The authors also extend theory by explaining how specific team characteristics influence the pattern of shared leadership development. Using a three‐study approach, the authors empirically examine the hypothesised relationships and conclude with a general discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of the findings.</p>
<p><strong>Read this Open Access article online for free.</strong></p>
<p>Natalia M. Lorinkova and Kathryn M. Bartol. 2020. <strong><em>Shared leadership development and team performance: A new look at the dynamics of shared leadership.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-34 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/peps.12409"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Personnel Psychology, 74(1), 1–31.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-41 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-46 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-35"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Shared leadership: A state‐of‐the‐art review and future research agenda</span><br />
The traditional “great man” approaches to leadership emphasise qualities of individual leaders for leadership success. In contrast, a rapidly growing body of research has started to examine shared leadership, which is broadly defined as an emergent team phenomenon whereby leadership roles and influence are distributed among team members.</p>
<p>Despite the progress, however, the extant literature on shared leadership has been fragmented with a variety of conceptualisations and operationalisations. This has resulted in little consensus regarding a suitable overarching theoretical framework and has undermined developing knowledge in this research domain.</p>
<p>To redress these problems, the authors provide a comprehensive review of the growing literature of shared leadership by (a) clarifying the definition of shared leadership; (b) conceptually disentangling shared leadership from other theoretically overlapping constructs; (c) addressing measurement issues; and (d) developing an integrative framework of the antecedents, proximal and distal consequences, and boundary conditions of shared leadership. The authors end their review by highlighting several new avenues for future research.</p>
<p>Zhu, Jinlong, Liao, Zhenyu, Yam, Kai Chi and Johnson, Russell E. 2018. <strong><em>Shared leadership: A state‐of‐the‐art review and future research agenda.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-35 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/job.2296"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(7), 834-852.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div></p>The post <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-shared-leadership/">Research tidbits: Shared leadership</a> first appeared on <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com">Institute for Sustainable Leadership</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research tidbits: What influences ethical work behaviour?</title>
		<link>https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-what-influences-ethical-work-behaviour/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doryanthus293]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2021 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Tidbits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/?p=6360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ethical workplace behaviour - to cc the supervisor or not?]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-42 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-47 fusion_builder_column_1_4 1_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:25%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:7.68%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:7.68%;--awb-width-medium:25%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:7.68%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:7.68%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-image-element " style="text-align:left;--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h2_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h2_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h2_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h2_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h2_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h2_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h2_typography-letter-spacing);"><span class=" fusion-imageframe imageframe-dropshadow imageframe-7 hover-type-none" style="-webkit-box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><img decoding="async" width="640" height="426" title="Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay" src="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/mark-1577991_640.jpg" alt class="img-responsive wp-image-6362" srcset="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/mark-1577991_640-200x133.jpg 200w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/mark-1577991_640-400x266.jpg 400w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/mark-1577991_640-600x399.jpg 600w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/mark-1577991_640.jpg 640w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 400px" /></span></div></div></div><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-48 fusion_builder_column_3_4 3_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:75%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:2.56%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:2.56%;--awb-width-medium:75%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:2.56%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:2.56%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-title title fusion-title-7 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-one"><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-left fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div><span class="awb-title-spacer fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"></span><h1 class="fusion-title-heading title-heading-left fusion-responsive-typography-calculated" style="margin:0;--fontSize:28;line-height:1.5;"><h3>Our research tidbits this week looks at what influences ethical behaviour in the workplace.</h3></h1><span class="awb-title-spacer"></span><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-right"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-43 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-49 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-36"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Understanding how leaders&#8217; humility promotes followers&#8217; emotions and ethical behaviours: Workplace spirituality as a mediator</span><br />
We propose a meditational model that explains why and how leaders&#8217; humility manifests into followers&#8217; empathy, gratitude, and ethical behaviours. Building on social information-processing theory (SIP), the authors hypothesise that, when a leader has a high level of humility, his or her followers receive signals that increase perceptions of workplace spirituality, which fosters an environment of ethical behaviour, empathy, and gratitude.</p>
<p>The authors collected time-lagged survey data (three time intervals, each a month apart) from employees and their colleagues (n = 286) in nine organisations in Pakistan&#8217;s telecom, education, and industrial sectors. Using structural equation modelling (SEM), the authors show that a leader&#8217;s humility predicts his or her employees&#8217; ethical behaviours, empathy, and gratitude. Moreover, perceptions of workplace spirituality mediated the time-lagged effects of a leader&#8217;s humility on his or her followers&#8217; ethical behaviours, empathy, and gratitude.</p>
<p>The findings largely support the theoretical foundations that indicate that a leader&#8217;s humility has important implications for his or her followers&#8217; positive emotions and behaviours through a unique process involving workplace spirituality.</p>
<p>Naseer, Saima, Syed, Fauzia, Nauman, Shazia, Fatima, Tasneem, Jameel, Ifrah &amp; Riaz, Namra. 2020. <strong><em>Understanding how leaders&#8217; humility promotes followers&#8217; emotions and ethical behaviors: Workplace spirituality as a mediator</em>.</strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-36 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17439760.2019.1615103"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15 (3), 407-419.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-44 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-50 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-37"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Link between organisational identification and counterproductive work behaviours</span><br />
Although counterproductive work behaviours can be extremely damaging to organisations and society as a whole, we do not yet fully understand the link between employees’ organisational attachment and their intention to engage in such behaviours.</p>
<p>Based on social identity theory, the authors predicted a negative relationship between organisational identification and counterproductive work behaviours. The authors also predicted that this relationship would be moderated by ambivalent identification. The authors explored counterproductive work behaviours toward the organisation (CWB-O) and other individuals (CWB-I). Study 1, a survey of 198 employees, revealed that employees who identified strongly with their organisation reported lower levels of CWB-O, but as predicted, only when ambivalent identification was low. Study 2 involved a manipulation in the form of a scenario presented to 228 U.S. employees, generally replicated the findings of Study 1: the link between organisational identification and CWB-O was stronger for participants in the low ambivalence condition than for those in the high ambivalence condition.</p>
<p>The interaction effect of ambivalent and organisational identification on CWB-I was only marginally significant in the second study. These findings provide new evidence for the positive influence of organisational identification under conditions of low ambivalence on counterproductive behaviours toward an organisation.</p>
<p>Valeria Ciampa, Moritz Sirowatka, Sebastian C. Schuh, Franco Fraccaroli &amp; Rolf van Dick. 2021. <strong><em>Ambivalent Identification as a Moderator of the Link Between Organizational Identification and Counterproductive Work Behaviors.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-37 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type fusion-has-button-gradient tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04262-0"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(1), 119–134. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-45 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-51 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-38"><p><span class="tidbithdr">The more a supervisor is cc’d on email, the less trust is felt</span><br />
The issue of trust has increasingly attracted attention in the business ethics literature. The aim is to contribute further to this literature by examining how the use of the carbon copy (cc) function in email communication influences felt trust.</p>
<p>The authors develop the argument that the use of cc enhances transparency—representing an important characteristic of workplace ethics—and hence promotes trust. The authors further argue that a downside of the cc option may be that it can also be experienced as a control mechanism, which may therefore negatively affect trust.</p>
<p>The results of the first study showed that the use of cc indeed enhances perceived transparency, but at the same time also leads to the experience of increased control. Building upon this insight, the findings of five subsequent studies consistently revealed that the use of cc negatively influences felt trust. More precisely, employees felt trusted the least when the supervisor was always included in cc (Studies 2 and 3). This effect on felt trust also negatively influenced how trustworthy the organisational climate was perceived (Study 4). The authors further replicated these results in two field surveys, which showed that the negative effect of cc on felt trust lowered perceptions of psychological safety (Study 5) and contributed to a culture of fear (Study 6).</p>
<p>Taken together, the findings suggest that when transparency in email communications is experienced as a control mechanism, its use is perceived as unethical, rather than as ethical. Implications and recommendations for future business ethics research are discussed.</p>
<p>Tessa Haesevoets, David De Cremer, Leander De Schutter, Jack McGuire, Yu Yang, Xie Jian &amp; Alain Van Hiel. 2021. <strong><em>Transparency and Control in Email Communication: The More the Supervisor is Put in cc the Less Trust is Felt.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-38 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04220-w"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 549–563.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-46 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-52 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-39"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Sustainability leadership: Can you drink money?</span><br />
Social and environmental shocks associated with freshwater management are inherently tied with the lives and well-being of all global citizens. Thus, exploring key actors’ roles is a critical element of this grand challenge. Utilising an inductive multiple case study, the authors explore sustainability leadership and subsequent organisational perspective-taking behaviours initiated by actors within freshwater management in response to the grand challenge.</p>
<p>A vibrant inductive model elicited three main themes: (1) identifying conditions for organisational perspective-taking, (2) modifying organisational frames of reference and (3) emergence of multi-level influence. The discussion extracts critical insights for sustainability leadership and highlights complexities involved in facilitating effective decision-making among diverse actors.</p>
<p>Fundamentally, this article contributes a distinct multi-level systems framework for sustainability leadership drawing from social–ecological systems theory and organisational resilience. The authors conclude by offering future research opportunities within sustainability leadership designed to bridge the gap between grand challenges and our abilities to solve them.</p>
<p>Gerson Francis Tuazon, Rachel Wolfgramm &amp; Kyle Powys Whyte. 2021. <strong><em>Can You Drink Money? Integrating Organizational Perspective-Taking and Organizational Resilience in a Multi-level Systems Framework for Sustainability Leadership.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-39 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04219-3"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 168(3), 469–490.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-47 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-53 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-40"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Social capital and managers’ use of corporate resources</span><br />
This study investigates how social capital affects managers’ use of corporate resources. The authors find that for firms located in U.S. counties with a high level of social capital, (i) corporate cash holdings have higher marginal value, (ii) the contribution of capital expenditures to shareholder value is higher, and (iii) acquirers experience higher announcement-period abnormal stock returns.</p>
<p>The authors further find that social capital decreases both over- and under-investment, and thus improves ex post corporate investment efficiency. The evidence suggests that in communities with a high level of social capital, strong social norms and dense social networks constrain unethical corporate behaviour, which induces more efficient use of corporate resources.</p>
<p>Ziqi Gao, Leye Li &amp; Louise Yi Lu. 2021. <strong><em>Social Capital and Managers’ Use of Corporate Resources.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-40 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04223-7"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 168(3), 593–613.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div></p>The post <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-what-influences-ethical-work-behaviour/">Research tidbits: What influences ethical work behaviour?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com">Institute for Sustainable Leadership</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research tidbits: Focus on diverse stakeholders</title>
		<link>https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-focus-on-diverse-stakeholders/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doryanthus293]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Tidbits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stakeholder relationship]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/?p=6353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Balancing stakeholder interests, consumer reaction, ethical behaviour, board composition - is it possible?]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-48 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-54 fusion_builder_column_1_4 1_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:25%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:7.68%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:7.68%;--awb-width-medium:25%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:7.68%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:7.68%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-image-element " style="text-align:left;--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h2_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h2_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h2_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h2_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h2_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h2_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h2_typography-letter-spacing);"><span class=" fusion-imageframe imageframe-dropshadow imageframe-8 hover-type-none" style="-webkit-box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><img decoding="async" width="200" height="143" src="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Diversity-200.jpg" alt class="img-responsive wp-image-5130"/></span></div></div></div><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-55 fusion_builder_column_3_4 3_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:75%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:2.56%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:2.56%;--awb-width-medium:75%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:2.56%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:2.56%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-title title fusion-title-8 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-one"><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-left fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div><span class="awb-title-spacer fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"></span><h1 class="fusion-title-heading title-heading-left fusion-responsive-typography-calculated" style="margin:0;--fontSize:28;line-height:1.5;"><h3>Our research tidbits this week considers the delicate balance between stakeholder interests, consumer reaction, ethical behaviour, CSR and board composition.</h3></h1><span class="awb-title-spacer"></span><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-right"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-49 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-56 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-41"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Harmful stakeholder strategies</span><br />
Stakeholder theory focuses on how more value is created if stakeholder relationships are governed by ethical principles such as integrity, respect, fairness, generosity and inclusiveness. However, it has not adequately addressed strategies that stakeholders perceive as harmful to their interests and how this perception can even lead some stakeholders to view the firm’s strategies as unethical.</p>
<p>To fill the void, this paper directly addresses strategies that stakeholders perceive as harmful to their interests, or what the authors refer to as harmful stakeholder strategies. Specifically, it identifies factors associated with stakeholder perceptions of harm that are likely to cause them to consider a strategy unethical, examines the negative implications for firms that pursue such strategies in terms of likely stakeholder responses and damage to stakeholder relationships, and provides theory to help explain how firms are likely to respond to stakeholder claims that a strategy is unethical, based on factors such as the strategic importance of the claim to the firm, how long the strategy has been in use, the costs of remediation, the risk of stakeholder mobilisation or new regulation, and whether firms can reasonably rationalise their actions.</p>
<p>Assessing harm allows a firm to make a more accurate estimate of the costs of a strategy and can assist managers in allocating resources intended to reduce or remediate harm.</p>
<p>Jeffrey S. Harrison &amp; Andrew C. Wicks. 2021. <strong><em>Harmful Stakeholder Strategies</em>.</strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-41 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04310-9"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 405–419.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-50 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-57 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-42"><p><span class="tidbithdr">The Glass Pyramid: Informal gender status hierarchy on boards</span><br />
Drawing on the status characteristic theory, the authors investigate the effect of gender on board directors’ status ranking and find that all else being equal, female directors’ status ranking is 81.48% of one position lower than that of male directors, a discrepancy that is attributable to gender.</p>
<p>The authors theorise on the mechanism that determines the ways in which the status value of gender on a board affects board interactions, and the authors predict how this mechanism influences firm outcomes, including excessive managerial spending, social responsibility performance, and firm risk.</p>
<p>The authors test their hypotheses in Chinese firms using an unbalanced panel that includes 5396 firm-year observations (86,019 director-year observations) for a period of 6 years and find them supported.</p>
<p>Lívia Markóczy, Sunny Li Sun &amp; Jigao Zhu. 2021. <strong><em>The Glass Pyramid: Informal Gender Status Hierarchy on Boards.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-42 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type fusion-has-button-gradient tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04247-z"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 168(4), 827–845</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-51 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-58 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-43"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Women and multiple board memberships: Social capital and institutional pressure</span><br />
We show unintended consequences of quota regulations to get women on boards. Board members may have different characteristics, and even among women, there are variations. The authors assume that the characteristics of the board members have an influence on their contributions to boards, to businesses as well as to society.</p>
<p>In this paper, the authors argue that different types of societal pressure to get women on boards have an influence on the social capital characteristics of the women getting multiple board memberships. The paper is drawing on institutional theory and social capital theory, and the authors distinguish between mimetic, normative, and coercive types of pressure. Through a cluster analysis of 58 Italian “golden skirts”, the authors show that different types of societal pressure may lead to differences in social capital characteristics.</p>
<p>The study has implications for the ongoing international debate about women and diversity on boards, and the authors propose developing a pressure theory for getting women on boards.</p>
<p>Alessandra Rigolini &amp; Morten Huse. 2021. <strong><em>Women and Multiple Board Memberships: Social Capital and Institutional Pressure.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-43 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04313-6"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 443–459. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-52 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-59 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-44"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Interaction between consumers’ personality, judgment of salesperson’s ethical treatment, and purchase</span><br />
Successful marketing efforts and professional sales encounters often depend on consumer involvement in the purchase decision process itself, which in turn may impact firm performance. Despite the importance of consumer involvement, research has yet to fully explain the relationship between consumer personality characteristics and the nature of consumer purchase involvement.</p>
<p>This study explores the degree to which consumer perception of salesperson ethical treatment helps explain the relationship between consumer personality characteristics and nature of involvement. Data were collected from a large sample of working adults placed in two scenario-based positive professional sales encounters featuring an important purchase decision.</p>
<p>The results indicated that adult consumers’ personality characteristics functioned through judgment of salesperson ethical treatment to affect the nature of purchase involvement. Specifically, consumer judgment of salesperson ethical treatment fully mediated a positive relationship between internal locus of control and cognitive (as opposed to affective) involvement. By comparison, consumer judgment of a salesperson ethical treatment partially mediated the positive relationship between emotional awareness and cognitive (as opposed to affective) involvement.</p>
<p>The above findings were similar for informational and relational salesperson customer-orientated scenarios. Key implications for selling professionals and sales organisations are discussed, such as augmenting consumers’ self-assessments to increase their perceptions of salesperson ethics and purchase involvement. The limitations and recommendations for future research are also presented.</p>
<p>Connie R. Bateman &amp; Sean R. Valentine. 2019. <strong><em>Consumers’ Personality Characteristics, Judgment of Salesperson Ethical Treatment, and Nature of Purchase Involvement.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-44 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04312-7"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(2), 309–331.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-53 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-60 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-45"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Socially responsible HRM and employees’ behaviours toward the environment?</span><br />
Based on the person-organisation fit theory, this research aims to investigate how socially responsible HRM (SRHRM) positively affects employees’ organisational citizenship behaviours toward the environment (OCBE) by increasing person-organisation fit.</p>
<p>This study also captures the moderating effect of the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility (RESR) in influencing the indirect effect of SRHRM on OCBE via person-organisation fit. Data were collected from 302 employees in a state-owned chain hotel in Shanghai, China.</p>
<p>The results indicated that SRHRM indirectly influenced employee’s engagement in OCBE through person-organisation fit. The positive relationship between SRHRM and person-organisation fit and the indirect effect of SRHRM on OCBE via person-organisation fit were more significant when employees hold high rather than low levels of RESR. Research implications and prospects were also explored in this study.</p>
<p>Hongdan Zhao, Qiongyao Zhou, Peixu He &amp; Cuiling Jiang. 2021. <strong><em>How and When Does Socially Responsible HRM Affect Employees’ Organizational Citizenship Behaviors Toward the Environment?</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-45 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04285-7"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics 169(2), 371–385. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div></p>The post <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-focus-on-diverse-stakeholders/">Research tidbits: Focus on diverse stakeholders</a> first appeared on <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com">Institute for Sustainable Leadership</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research tidbits: Sustainability and luxury</title>
		<link>https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-sustainability-and-luxury/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doryanthus293]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 04:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Tidbits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/?p=6347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can you reconcile ethicality and luxury brand purchases?]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-54 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-61 fusion_builder_column_1_4 1_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:25%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:7.68%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:7.68%;--awb-width-medium:25%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:7.68%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:7.68%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-image-element " style="text-align:left;--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h2_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h2_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h2_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h2_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h2_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h2_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h2_typography-letter-spacing);"><span class=" fusion-imageframe imageframe-dropshadow imageframe-9 hover-type-none" style="-webkit-box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><img decoding="async" width="640" height="422" title="Image by Michael Gaida from Pixabay" src="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/city-4576421_640.jpg" alt class="img-responsive wp-image-6095" srcset="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/city-4576421_640-200x132.jpg 200w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/city-4576421_640-400x264.jpg 400w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/city-4576421_640-600x396.jpg 600w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/city-4576421_640.jpg 640w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 400px" /></span></div></div></div><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-62 fusion_builder_column_3_4 3_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:75%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:2.56%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:2.56%;--awb-width-medium:75%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:2.56%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:2.56%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-title title fusion-title-9 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-one"><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-left fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div><span class="awb-title-spacer fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"></span><h1 class="fusion-title-heading title-heading-left fusion-responsive-typography-calculated" style="margin:0;--fontSize:28;line-height:1.5;"><h3>This week, our research articles consider whether luxury brands can be ethical in terms of CSR actions, and whether this works in the eyes of the consumer.</h3></h1><span class="awb-title-spacer"></span><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-right"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-55 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-63 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-46"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Can luxury brands be ethical?</span><br />
Past research suggests that consumers may negatively evaluate luxury brands that engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) because they do not perceive a consistency between luxury and ethical consumption (sophistication liability).</p>
<p>As luxury is an increasingly relevant industry, it is important to understand how to promote ethical luxury consumption and cleaner production practices in luxury. This article extends previous findings and provides a framework that shows the conditions under which luxury and ethical consumption can be compatible. In particular, the authors find that consumers perceive sophisticated brands as less ethical than sincere brands when their social identity goals are salient (i.e., they focus on their social relationships); however, when consumers personal identity goals are salient (i.e., they focus on themselves), they perceive sophisticated brands as equally ethical as sincere brands.</p>
<p>Finally, the authors also show that luxury brands&#8217; CSR actions should focus on the firms&#8217; own consumers whereas sincere brands’ CSR actions should focus on society in general.</p>
<p>Costa Pinto, Diego, Herter, Márcia Maurer, Gonçalves, Dilney &amp; Sayin, Eda. 2019. <strong><em>Can luxury brands be ethical? Reducing the sophistication liability of luxury brands</em>.</strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-46 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619320517"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 1366-1376.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-56 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-64 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-47"><p><span class="tidbithdr">How high-net-worth social media influencers reconcile ethicality and living a luxury lifestyle</span><br />
Drawing from a multi-sourced data corpus (in-depth interviews and Instagram posts) gathered from high-net-worth (HNW) social media influencers, this article explores how these individuals reconcile ethicality and living a luxury lifestyle through the enactment of three types of personas on Instagram: (1) Ambassador of ‘True’ Luxury, (2) Altruist, and (3) ‘Good’ Role Model.</p>
<p>By applying the concepts of taste regimes and social moral licensing, the authors find that HNW social media influencers conspicuously enact and display ethicality, thereby retaining legitimacy in the field of luxury consumption. As these individuals are highly influential, they could leave a potentially significant mark on public discourse and, consequently, on their audiences’ construction of ethically responsible luxury consumption.</p>
<p>In this vein, this article offers significant managerial insights into professional influencers and discusses ethical managerial practices to ensure ethical collaborations between influencers and managers.</p>
<p>Marina Leban, Thyra Uth Thomsen, Sylvia von Wallpach &amp; Benjamin G. Voyer. 2021. <strong><em>Constructing Personas: How High-Net-Worth Social Media Influencers Reconcile Ethicality and Living a Luxury Lifestyle.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-47 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type fusion-has-button-gradient tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-020-04485-6"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(2), 225–239.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-57 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-65 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-48"><p><span class="tidbithdr">CSR actions, brand value, and willingness to pay a premium price for luxury brands</span><br />
Sustainable luxury is a strategic issue for managers and for society, yet it remains poorly understood. This research seeks to clarify how corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions directly and indirectly (through brand value dimensions) affect consumers’ willingness to pay a premium price (WTPP) for luxury brand products, as well as how a long-term orientation (LTO) might moderate these relationships.</p>
<p>A scenario study presents fictional CSR actions of two brands, representing different luxury products, to 1,049 respondents from two countries (France and Tunisia). The results of a structural equation modeling approach show that the luxury brands’ CSR actions negatively affect customer WTPP overall and for each brand. The luxury brands’ functional and symbolic value dimensions positively mediate the effects of CSR actions on WTPP, whereas social value does not. The effects of CSR actions and brand symbolic value on WTTP do not differ between countries. The effect of functional value on WTPP differs across countries, such that it is stronger for high-LTO than low-LTO cultures. Inversely, the effect of social on customer WTPP is stronger for low-LTO than high-LTO cultures. These findings have theoretical and practical implications for luxury brand managers.</p>
<p>Mbaye Fall Diallo, Norchène Ben Dahmane Mouelhi, Mahesh Gadekar &amp; Marie Schill. 2021. <strong><em>CSR Actions, Brand Value, and Willingness to Pay a Premium Price for Luxury Brands: Does Long-Term Orientation Matter?</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-48 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-020-04486-5"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(2), 241–260. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-58 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-66 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-49"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Effects of pride and gratitude appeals on sustainable luxury brands</span><br />
This study synthesises research on evolutionary psychology, emotional appeals, and viral advertising in order to develop a novel perspective on how sustainable luxury brands can be effectively promoted on social media.</p>
<p>The results of two experiments show that the emotional appeals of pride and gratitude increase consumer intentions to spread electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) about sustainable luxury brands via two discrete mechanisms. Study 1 establishes that featuring the pride appeal increases eWOM intentions by heightening the luxury dimension of sustainable luxury brands, whereas featuring the gratitude appeal increases eWOM intentions by heightening the sustainability dimension of sustainable luxury brands. Study 2 shows that these discrete effects of emotional appeals influence consumers to adopt different types of eWOM behaviours toward sustainable luxury brands.</p>
<p>Specifically, the pride appeal increases consumer intentions to broadcast eWOM via status attainment motives. In contrast, the gratitude appeal increases consumer intentions to narrowcast eWOM via affiliation seeking motives. The findings offer novel theoretical insights and provide managers with tools to promote sustainable luxury brands in a digital environment.</p>
<p>Felix Septianto, Yuri Seo &amp; Amy Christine Errmann. 2021. <strong><em>Distinct Effects of Pride and Gratitude Appeals on Sustainable Luxury Brands</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-49 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-020-04484-7"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics 169(2), 211–224. </span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-59 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-67 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-50"><p><span class="tidbithdr">How do nationalistic appeals affect foreign luxury brand reputation?</span><br />
Drawing from cognitive learning theories the authors hypothesise that exposure to nationalistic appeals that suggest consumers should shun foreign brands for moral reasons increases the general belief in consumers that buying foreign brands is morally wrong. In parallel, drawing from the theory of psychological reactance the authors posit that such appeals may, against their communication goal, increase the reputation of foreign luxury brands.</p>
<p>The authors term the juxtaposition of these apparently contradictory effects the “Ambivalence Hypothesis.” Further, drawing from prior research on source-similarity effects the authors posit that foreign luxury brands that communicate cultural proximity to target consumers (i.e., a local brand positioning) reinforce psychological reactance (“Clean Conscience Hypothesis”). The authors test these hypotheses experimentally in the context of luxury car brand advertising in China, a market that is heavily dominated by foreign brands, and therefore provides a breeding ground for ambivalent consumer reactions.</p>
<p>Results show that exposure to nationalistic appeals enhances consumers’ national identity dispositions (patriotism, local identity), which results in higher levels of consumer ethnocentrism. Further, nationalistic appeals enhance the social responsibility associations that consumers hold for foreign luxury brands and their countries of origin, which results in a higher brand reputation. Finally, effects of nationalistic appeals on foreign luxury brand reputation are positively stronger for brands using a local vs. a foreign or a global positioning. These findings suggest that nationalistic appeals are a double-edged sword with important implications for ethics in political communication and luxury brand marketing.</p>
<p>Boris Bartikowski, Fernando Fastoso &amp; Heribert Gierl. 2021. <strong><em>How Nationalistic Appeals Affect Foreign Luxury Brand Reputation: A Study of Ambivalent Effects.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-50 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-020-04483-8"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 169(2), 261–277.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div></p>The post <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-sustainability-and-luxury/">Research tidbits: Sustainability and luxury</a> first appeared on <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com">Institute for Sustainable Leadership</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research tidbits: Authentic leadership</title>
		<link>https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-authentic-leadership/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doryanthus293]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 01:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Tidbits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leader characteristics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/?p=6340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What does authentic leadership really mean and does it make a difference?]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-60 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-68 fusion_builder_column_1_4 1_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:25%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:7.68%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:7.68%;--awb-width-medium:25%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:7.68%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:7.68%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-image-element " style="text-align:left;--awb-caption-title-font-family:var(--h2_typography-font-family);--awb-caption-title-font-weight:var(--h2_typography-font-weight);--awb-caption-title-font-style:var(--h2_typography-font-style);--awb-caption-title-size:var(--h2_typography-font-size);--awb-caption-title-transform:var(--h2_typography-text-transform);--awb-caption-title-line-height:var(--h2_typography-line-height);--awb-caption-title-letter-spacing:var(--h2_typography-letter-spacing);"><span class=" fusion-imageframe imageframe-dropshadow imageframe-10 hover-type-none" style="-webkit-box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);box-shadow: 3px 3px 7px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><img decoding="async" width="640" height="425" src="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/light-bulb-1246043_640.jpg" alt class="img-responsive wp-image-6343" srcset="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/light-bulb-1246043_640-200x133.jpg 200w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/light-bulb-1246043_640-400x266.jpg 400w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/light-bulb-1246043_640-600x398.jpg 600w, https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/light-bulb-1246043_640.jpg 640w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 400px" /></span></div></div></div><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-69 fusion_builder_column_3_4 3_4 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:75%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:2.56%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:2.56%;--awb-width-medium:75%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:2.56%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:2.56%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-title title fusion-title-10 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-one"><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-left fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div><span class="awb-title-spacer fusion-no-large-visibility fusion-no-medium-visibility fusion-no-small-visibility"></span><h1 class="fusion-title-heading title-heading-left fusion-responsive-typography-calculated" style="margin:0;--fontSize:28;line-height:1.5;"><h3>Our research tidbits this week considers what authentic leadership really means, can it be adequately measured in terms of research, and does it actually make a difference?</h3></h1><span class="awb-title-spacer"></span><div class="title-sep-container title-sep-container-right"><div class="title-sep sep- sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-61 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-70 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-51"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Does authentic leadership matter?</span><br />
This research contributes to an improved understanding of authentic leadership at the work–life interface. The authors build on conservation of resources theory to develop a leader–follower crossover model of the impact of authentic leadership on followers’ job satisfaction through leaders’ and followers’ work–life balance.</p>
<p>The model integrates authentic leadership and crossover literatures to suggest that followers perceive authentic leaders to better balance their professional and private lives, which in turn enables followers to achieve a positive work–life balance, and ultimately makes them more satisfied in their jobs. Data from working adults collected in a correlational field study (N = 121) and an experimental study (N = 154) generally supported indirect effects linking authentic leadership to job satisfaction through work–life balance perceptions. However, both studies highlighted the relevance of followers’ own work–life balance as a mediator more so than the sequence of leaders’ and followers’ work–life balance.</p>
<p>The authors discuss theoretical implications of these findings from a conservation of resources perspective, and emphasise how authentic leadership represents an organisational resource at the work–life interface. The authors also suggest practical implications of developing authentic leadership in organisations to promote employees’ well-being as well as avenues for future research.</p>
<p>Braun, Susanne and Peus, Claudia. 2018. <strong><em>Crossover of Work–Life Balance Perceptions: Does Authentic Leadership Matter?</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-51 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-016-3078-x"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business Ethics, 149(4), 875-893.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-62 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-71 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-52"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Is too much positivity a trap in leadership studies?</span><br />
We study authentic leadership as a prominent but problematic example of positive leadership that the authors use as a more general “warning” against the current fashion of excessive positivity in leadership studies.</p>
<p>Without trying to cover “everything”, the authors critically examine the principal tenets of mainstream authentic leadership theory and reveal a number of fundamental flaws: shaky philosophical and theoretical foundations, tautological reasoning, weak empirical studies, nonsensical measurement tools, unsupported knowledge claims, and a generally simplistic and out of date view of corporate life.</p>
<p>Even though this study focuses on authentic leadership, much of the authors’ criticism is also applicable to other popular positive leadership theories, such as transformational, servant, ethical, and spiritual leadership.</p>
<p>Alvesson, Mats and Einola, Katja. 2019. <strong><em>Warning for excessive positivity: Authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-52 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type fusion-has-button-gradient tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984318307896"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">The Leadership Quarterly, 30(4), 383-395.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-63 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-72 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-53"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Be(com)ing real: Mindfulness and authentic leadership</span><br />
Although authentic leadership has been shown to inform a host of positive outcomes at work, the literature has dedicated little attention to identifying its personal antecedents and effective means to enhance it. Building on strong theoretical links and initial evidence, the authors propose mindfulness as a predictor of authentic leadership.</p>
<p>In 2 multi-source field studies (cross-sectional and experimental), the authors investigated (a) the role of leaders’ trait mindfulness and (b) the effectiveness of a low-dose mindfulness intervention for perceptions of authentic leadership. The results of both studies confirmed a positive relation between leaders’ trait mindfulness and authentic leadership as rated by both followers and leaders. Moreover, the results of study 2 showed that the intervention increased authentic leadership via gains in leaders’ mindfulness, as perceived by both followers and leaders.</p>
<p>In addition, the authors found that the intervention positively extended to followers’ work attitudes via authentic leadership. The paper concludes with a discussion of the study’s implications for leadership theory and leader development.</p>
<p><strong>Read this Open Access article online for free.</strong></p>
<p>Nuebold, Annika, Van Quaquebeke, Niels and Hülsheger, Ute R. 2020. <strong><em>Be(com)ing Real: a Multi-source and an Intervention Study on Mindfulness and Authentic Leadership.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-53 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10869-019-09633-y"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(4), 469-488.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-64 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-73 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-54"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Authentic leadership towards sustainability in higher education – an integrated green model</span><br />
Sustainability in higher education has drawn the attention of various scholars. However, to date, very few studies have examined the human side of green employee behaviour towards sustainability.</p>
<p>Thus, to address this gap, this study aims to analyse the effect of green authentic leadership towards sustainability in higher education, with the intervening impact of green internal branding and green training. The study examined the data collected from faculty and their immediate heads from private higher education institutions. Tests for reliability, validity and internal consistency of measures followed by exploratory factor analysis were conducted for each measure. The hypotheses were tested through hierarchical regression analysis while confirmatory factor analysis was done to test the fit of the model.</p>
<p>The results supported the fit of the proposed model and showed positive and significant effect of green authentic leadership on the sustainability in higher education. Further, green internal branding had a mediating effect between green authentic leadership and sustainability and green training showed a significant moderating role between green authentic leadership and sustainability relationship.</p>
<p>Srivastava, Anugamini Priya; Mani, Venkatesh; Yadav, Mohit and Joshi, Yatish. 2020. <strong><em>Authentic leadership towards sustainability in higher education – an integrated green model.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-54 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJM-08-2019-0404/full/html"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">International Journal of Manpower, 41(7), 901-923.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-65 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-74 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-55"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Authentic leadership and meaningfulness at work</span><br />
This study aims to examine whether, how, and when authentic leadership shapes followers&#8217; perceptions of meaningfulness at work. Using authentic leadership theory, the authors posit that authentic leadership leads to more favourable perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which, in turn, results in enhanced experiences of meaningfulness at work.</p>
<p>In addition to studying authentic leadership as a driver of CSR perceptions, and hence meaningfulness, the authors also examine if followers&#8217; attributions of self-centered motives to organisational engagement in CSR moderates the above relationship. In all, 368 employees from Indian IT industry participated in the survey. Data were analysed using Process (Hayes 2013) in SPSS. Results supported the hypothesised moderated mediation model by revealing that attribution of self-centered motives undermines the positive impact of authentic leadership on CSR perceptions, and, subsequently, meaningfulness.</p>
<p>By presenting CSR as a source of meaningfulness at work, this study establishes CSR as an important tool for fostering employee well-being. The internal corporate communication should emphasise how CSR activities of the organisation represent core organisational values and organisation’s genuine concern for the society.</p>
<p>Chaudhary, Richa. 2020. <strong><em>Authentic leadership and meaningfulness at work: Role of employees&#8217; CSR perceptions and evaluations.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-55 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MD-02-2019-0271/full/html"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Management Decision, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-66 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:998.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-75 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:20px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-56"><p><span class="tidbithdr">Putting the leader back into authentic leadership</span><br />
Increasingly poor and unethical decision-making on the part of leaders across the globe, such as the recent Australian cricket ball tampering scandal, pose a significant challenge for society and for organisations.</p>
<p>Authentic leadership development is one strategy that has been positioned as an antidote to unethical leadership behaviours. However, despite growing interest in authentic leadership, the construct still embodies several criticisms including conceptual clarity; leader-centricity; bias towards the person, not the leader; philosophical ambiguity; and demographic challenges. Each of these criticisms will be explored in depth to inform a re-conceptualisation of the authentic leader construct, comprising indicators of awareness, sincerity, balanced processing, positive moral perspective and informal influence. Importantly, this revised conceptualisation considers how researchers can conceptually distinguish between authentic leaders, followers and individuals.</p>
<p>To conclude, the authors propose a research agenda for authentic leaders, encouraging the pursuit of further construct clarity, including the development of rigorous authentic leader behaviour measures, expanding the psychometric profile of the authentic leader construct, increasing the focus on authentic followers and enhancing leader development programmes.</p>
<p><strong>Read this Open Access article online for free.</strong></p>
<p>Crawford, Joseph A., Dawkins, Sarah, Martin, Angela and Lewis, Gemma. 2020. <strong><em>Putting the leader back into authentic leadership: Reconceptualising and rethinking leaders.</em></strong></p>
</div><div style="text-align:left;"><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-custom fusion-button-default button-56 fusion-button-default-span fusion-button-default-type tidbitbutton" style="--button_accent_color:#000000;--button_border_color:#fbab18;--button_accent_hover_color:#ffffff;--button_border_hover_color:#21409a;--button_gradient_top_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_bottom_color:#fbab18;--button_gradient_top_color_hover:#21409a;--button_gradient_bottom_color_hover:#21409a;--button_text_transform:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0312896219836460"><i class="fa-arrow-right fas awb-button__icon awb-button__icon--default button-icon-left" aria-hidden="true"></i><span class="fusion-button-text awb-button__text awb-button__text--default">Australian Journal of Management, 45(1), 114-133.</span></a></div></div></div></div></div></p>The post <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com/research-tidbits-authentic-leadership/">Research tidbits: Authentic leadership</a> first appeared on <a href="https://instituteforsustainableleadership.com">Institute for Sustainable Leadership</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
